Michigan Audit Supports Impossible Colorado Results

Last week, we revealed through a basic audit of Colorado election return data that there was obvious evidence of algorithmic manipulation in the presidential election results in Colorado. Now, conducting a forensic audit of 22 Dominion voting machines in Antrim county, Michigan, has found the same kind of manipulation, concluding that “the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.”

Mile High Evening News spoke to a former systems tester for Sequoia Voting Systems, which was acquired by Smartmatic in 2005. In 2010, Dominion Voting Systems acquired Smartmatic, including the source code for the software responsible for calculating results. Our source, speaking on condition of anonymity, describes how the invisible hand, fraction magic capabilities of Dominion’s voting software were being implemented in the mid-2000s, noting that these capabilities (fractional voting, remote access) had absolutely no purpose in federal elections and that anyone with even basic access to either an individual voting machine or the master machine could easily change the results of the voting and back out without anyone knowing they were ever there.

Antrim County was originally spotlighted because it was discovered that 3,000 votes in the county had mysteriously flipped from Trump to Biden. The Michigan secretary of state and the Antrim County clerk blamed human error, but the subsequent audit by Allied Security found it to be a machine and/or software issue.

The company says “error” on this scale is a “national security issue.” Dominion Voting Systems is used in 28 states, including Colorado.

The tabulation log examined by Allied Security found a whopping 65.05% error rate – meaning these voting events were initially recorded as error and required “adjudication” – meaning the results were adjusted after the fact by a third party.

The audit also noted that the machines were capable of being accessed over the internet. This is overwhelmingly likely since the machines are simply consumer-grade Windows computers, capable of connections and data being changed behind the scenes without the operator being aware anything has happened.

Dominion usually disallows a jurisdiction from examining the source code of the voting machines, but Michigan law allows for the examination of the code to ensure its proper operation. According to Colorado Revised Statutes, the state also requires the software to be on file with the Secretary of State:

1-5-620. Electronic or electromechanical voting system information – software.
When a political subdivision purchases or adopts an electronic or electromechanical voting
system, the vendor of the system shall send to the secretary of state copies of the software user and operator manuals, and any other information, specifications, or documentation required by the secretary of state relating to a certified system and its equipment. Any such information or materials that are not on file with and approved by the secretary of state, including any updated or modified materials, shall not be used in an election.

Of course, if the Colorado secretary of state doesn’t include source code in the description of “any other information, specifications, or documentation,” access to the code may require a court order. Colorado counties physically possess the machines, so the code is readily accessible to anyone willing to dig.

Voting systems in the United States are considered critical infrastructure and are therefore a national security issue. We must demand an audit of the 2020 vote in Colorado, including an examination of the source code of the tabulation machines used to count and report election results.