ABLECHILD: FBI Shooters Report Excludes Any Data Relating to Mental Health and Psychiatric Drugs
2 min read(The Gateway Pundit)
Guest post by Joe Hoft at JoeHoft.com – republished with permission.
Republished with permission from AbleChild
A new report by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) documenting the common factors relating to active shooter incidents completely excludes psychiatric drug use. The executive summary highlights that in 2013 President Obama signed into law the Investigative Assistance for Violent Crimes Act of 2012 in response to clarifying the role of the FBI in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook mass shooting. Nothing in this Act prohibits or limits the collection of vital data related to mental health products or services that may be pertinent in mass shooting incidents.
Ironically, in the introduction, the FBI explains that it will not include information about drug related violence. Why? What does that even mean? Is the FBI referring to illegal and legal? Even though the intent of the report is to “better understand the levels of threats associated with active shooter incidents,” the FBI has deliberately left out information that not only provides insight into the actions of the shooters, but in today’s prescription-fueled drug world, is critical. Missing from the FBI report literally is anything to do with mental health. Psychiatric drugs, psychotropic drugs, mental health, mental health records, behavioral health, or medications do not show up in the report.
Oops, mental health does appear in the report in one spot where the FBI is highlighting the location where one shooting occurred. The real crime here is how the FBI has deliberately excluded any information that is common in so many of the shooters’ backgrounds – psychiatric drug use. There is a long history of psychiatric products and services rearing its ugly head from Columbine, Colorado to Sandy Hook, Connecticut, to Parkland, Florida and most recently Lewiston, Maine. Rather, the FBI believes a 29-page report discussing the location of the shootings, how many have been killed and wounded and which months had the highest number of shootings is helpful to the public.
One might find that The Investigative Assistance for Violent Crimes Act would focus on the shooters’ mental health background. For example, information about Adam Lanza’s treating psychiatrist and whether Lanza was on psychiatric medications at the time of the shooting might be interesting. To date, twelve years after the shooting, Lanza’s mental health records still have not been made public. There is n
This post was published at the Gateway Pundit. Read it in its entirety here. Read More
Note: Some of the content in this article may have been generated with the assistance of AI. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated text can occasionally contain errors or outdated information. Please verify any important details independently.