EXPERTS: COVID Testing Is Worthless

At Mile High Evening News, we have exposed the test-driven truth behind the supposed coronavirus resurgence the state (and nation) is experiencing, as well as discussed the unreliable and suspect nature of coronavirus testing.

Now a peer review of the paper that initially endorsed the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test as the go-to reliable standard for coronavirus testing has found that there are “inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.” Read that again. The PCR test that the world has relied on to determine novel coronavirus spread is utterly useless. The paper that was the genesis of the PCR test being used for COVID-19 was published as “peer-reviewed” within 24 hours when there were only six confirmed coronavirus cases. Two of the paper’s own authors are on the editorial board of Eurosurveillance, the journal that published the paper in record time.

The scientists that peer-reviewed the PCR-endorsing paper are senior molecular geneticists, biochemists, immunologists, and microbiologists from the US, Europe, and Japan. They identified 10 fatal flaws in the PCR test as a tool for novel coronavirus detection, including:

• it is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design
• results are enormously variable
• it cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments
• it has no positive or negative controls (for determining that it is definitely the SARS-CoV-2 virus and not a different coronavirus)
• has no standard operating procedure
• does not seem to have been properly peer-reviewed

According to the review, the PCR test conducted at or above 35 cycles (as is done in most US and European labs) produces a false positive probability of 97%. This makes sense in light of the CDC admitting that 94% of coronavirus-attributed deaths in the US are among people with two or more comorbidities, as well as why so-called asymptomatic infections have become such a big concern when they’ve never been considered in prior pandemics.

Does this mean that the syndrome known as COVID-19 is a hoax? Of course not. But it does mean that case numbers, hospitalizations, and deaths attributed to the novel coronavirus are ALL suspect. Remember the definitions: a positive result of a now-debunked and worthless PCR test is what defines a person as a coronavirus case, hospitalization, or death. No evidence of dying BECAUSE of the virus is necessary. The supposed 280,000 dead in the United States is a scientifically worthless number.

When combined with the knowledge that the overwhelming majority of coronavirus-linked deaths are among the very old (half of the deaths in Colorado are among those who are much older than the average live expectancy), and the fact that coronavirus-attributed deaths have been offset by identical declines in death from other causes, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that the entire coronavirus “pandemic” has been a giant scam, and the worst economic and societal policy blunder the world has ever seen.

The conclusion that must be drawn from this evidence is that the COVID-19 pandemic was never an actual pandemic. We are currently unable to determine how many people have died from COVID-19 since our standard is simply a person dying with a positive (or presumed positive) fraudulent test. Even the presence of COVID-19’s signature pneumonia is not required in the United States, which is likely the primary reason we have more coronavirus “deaths” than other countries.

The lockdowns were unjustified.

Masking is physically and epidemiologically ridiculous.

The hysteria is absurd.

The economic and societal destruction is criminal.

Read the lie-shattering peer review here.