The Wheels of Justice for Tina Peters Are Turning Slowly in Court
3 min read(The Gateway Pundit)

Guest post by Martel Maxim.
On July 22nd, a Habeas Corpus hearing was held in the Denver Federal Courthouse. US District Court Chief Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak presided to determine if Judge Matthew Barrett committed reversible error by sentencing Tina Peters to prison because he, in essence, deemed her speech to be a danger to society.
Here’s exactly what Judge Barrett said during Tina’s sentencing:
“You are no hero. You abused your position – and you’re a charlatan who used, and is still using your prior position to peddle a snake oil that’s been proven to be junk time and time again. Your lies are well-documented and these convictions are serious. I’m convinced you’d do it all over again if you could. You’re as defiant as a defendant as this court has ever seen.”
In other words, at the root of Tina’s sentencing was the Deep State’s fear that her right to free speech would continue to jeopardize their overwhelming lie emphasizing our elections are safe, transparent and fully trustworthy. FOR THESE AND OTHER AGREGIOUS VIOLATIONS OF LAW, AT A MINIMUM, TINA PETERS SHOULD BE OUT ON BOND PENDING HER APPEAL.
Sadly, Tina wasn’t even allowed to participate in this hearing of hers electronically, from where she continues to languish at the LaVista Prison in Pueblo, Colorado, while the legal team who put her in prison walk free.
One shocking participant at Tuesday’s event was among the dirtiest of them all, Robert Shapiro. This Colorado AG Assistant who argued for the charges against Tina in her trial, had the audacity to show up outside the courtroom amongst the 60+ supporters of Tina, prior to the courtroom doors opening. Most supporters probably didn’t even recognize who he was, even though his DNA is all over everything that resulted in Tina’s conviction.
The collusion between Shapiro and Mesa County Dan Rubinstein didn’t provide Tina an avenue for defending herself, as they crafted despicable charges that prevented her from presenting exculpatory evidence and key witnesses in her case. The persecution and subsequent prosecution of Tina Peters continues to be among the most corrupt (and on par with the lawfare directed against President Trump) series of events in American history, making the legacy crimes of the mafia look like kindergarten.
The damage done by these two prosecutors who weaved the false charges to bring Tina down, seriously challenges the well known criminality of mafia kingpins like Al Capone and John Gotti. Actually, Shapiro and Rubinstein’s damage is orders of magnitude worse due to their treasonous nature, which practically destroyed our country via the stolen elections they attempted to cover-up.
Ultimately, there is additional evidence that this entire case started in DC in Biden’s Justice Department. Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray even participated in a conference call with Mesa County where Tina’s actions were discussed. This and other actions from the federal government indicate that this was a federal issue from the start.
EXCLUSIVE: Federal Actions Arguably Allow President Trump Ability to Step In and Pardon Tina Peters
The objective of all these people and entities in this case was to make an example out of Tina so no other Election Clerks would even think of questioning the 2024 Election. Thankfully, that plan backfired due to the “too big to rig” election results in 2024. However with their cover-up PSYOP in place, the Deep State figured they could resume their election manipulation and theft under the cover of darkness. They were wrong, as the findings of Tina Peters blew their cover wide open. (Visit https://tinapeters.us/ and be sure to watch the documentary “Selection Code” linked from the menu at the top of the Homepage to understand the truth behind the scenes.)
Tina’s Habeas claim involves whether her Constitutional Right of Free Speech was severely violated is a Federal is
This post was published at the Gateway Pundit. Read it in its entirety here. Read More
Note: Some of the content in this article may have been generated with the assistance of AI. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated text can occasionally contain errors or outdated information. Please verify any important details independently.
