EXCLUSIVE: Dominion FRAUD in Colorado Election Returns
2 min readVoter fraud is real in Colorado, and this is the evidence we have suspected was here all along.
The exact same constant ratio trend seen in states like Georgia and Pennsylvania is in the 2020 Colorado election returns. Colorado is one of the 29 states that use Dominion voting software, which reportedly uses voting machines accessible over the internet during voting.
Half of the 113 vote tally updates in Colorado had the exact same ratio of 40:57 moving linearly to 42:55. At the point where Donald Trump’s percentage/ratio reaches 40%, 57 of the remaining 90 vote dumps have a consistent ratio overriding what should have been a naturally varying ratio.
The most damning evidence is that the applied ratio settles at the exact same ratio as the final ratio of the election.
Dominion is rumored to have cleared out their Denver offices and lawyered up because this kind of mathematical manipulation has become evident in election returns all over the country. At this point, it is not clear whether Dominion machines in Colorado were running Smartmatic software, but it is clear that the returns were mathematically manipulated:
Colorado was a state that the pollsters predicted would go narrowly to Biden, and yet he supposedly won in a landslide with a 13.2% margin. It is entirely uncoincidental that the repeating ratio found in the Colorado vote dumps starts at a 17% margin and shifts towards 13.2%.
This clear mathematical evidence will no doubt be dismissed as a conspiracy theory by those comfortable with the “election” of the worst presidential candidate in history, but these results can be easily replicated by anyone with access to the New York Times real-time election return data.
Note: Some of the content in this article may have been generated with the assistance of AI. While we strive for accuracy, AI-generated text can occasionally contain errors or outdated information. Please verify any important details independently.
Incredible. CO should be added to the list of lawsuits.
Yes. I believe this shows that the software algorithm part of the election fraud was present in all Dominion systems, but the overnight ballot dumping was only needed in battleground states.
This is amazing! So with the numbers you showed in the video concerning the batches, how did you find that? Do you have a link? I would love to see that
I will do a video on this soon. The raw data is linked above.
Please let us know when you’ve done that video!
Eager to see it, as I know are others.
TIA!
The first follow up video is done. Posted a couple days ago.
Factless!! CO’s ballot counting machines are never connected t to the internet. No Dominion employee ever touches the server keyboard during the election. A Logic and Accuracy test is performed by each clerk which insures the readers are reading exactly correctly. Each machine was 100% accurate with the test decks created by the clerks. CO is the only state that does a post election Risk Limiting Audit which certifies the machines are reading properly. All of this is available to anyone who would take the time to contact their County clerk. We can count on CO election results being fair, accurate, honest and complete.
Ha ha ha ! Sure buddy ! It’s all on the up and uo 😂When is Santa coming ?
That is false. The Dominion proposal specifically states that a bridge (their word) would be built between SCORE (voter database) and their database. SCORE is web accessible.
Second. Observers witnessed election officials receiving email messages that the system went down on 11/3, the received a barrage of texts from other officials asking about the outage. The only way this is possible is that this system has access to the outside world.
Third, no where in the Dominion proposal did they state the system would be offline. To the contrary, the proposal expressly states that some counties would be hosted on Dominions server located at Dominions offices.
Also, State Law requires that 4% of ballots are reviewed in the RLA. ONLY O.051% were actually audited.
Second, auditing an individual ballot will never detect if the system is using a weighted voting algorithm. No one, NOT ONE PERSON, has either manually counted to ballots to ensure Dominion’s count is right, or verified the total number of votes are correct at any level. The RLA is a joke.
The Dominion software itself creates the ballot list to be used for the “post election Risk Limiting Audit”. So the fox is guarding the hen house and is far from a trustworthy way of certifying results.
I’m not sure a single thing you posted there is correct. DVS machines in every state examined were connected to the internet. In several instances software updates were made to DVS machines after the logic and accuracy test. CO is not the only state performing a risk limiting audit.
Further, DVS was heavily involved in several states’ preelection DVS testing procedures. During the DVS test process, up to hundreds of thousands of test ballots are created/printed. They are indistinguishable from election ballots (i.e., they are counterfeit ballots). At conclusion of the test runs, those ballots are supposed to be ‘spoiled’ (shredded).
However, we now know in several circumstances, unspoiled ballots were stored (insecurely) rather than destroyed. Those counterfeits could be swapped with actual ballots between election day and your post-election RLA to sync machine-and-paper numbers perfectly for the audit. Don’t know that it happened in CO. But without question, it is completely possible. Dominion renders it so. Just so you’re aware.
As an aside, Colorado also relies on a VBM system which is an inherent fraud magnet. It is an open door to vote harvesting, voter intimidation, and vote theft. So even in your best year, your claim that CO’s election results are fair, accurate, honest and complete, would be dubious. This was not your “best year”.
I firmly believe this is why Cory Gardner lost to Lickenpooper!!!! The ONLY republican senate seat lost was his!!!!
Common sense tells me that there is no possible way President Trump lost by 5 in 16 and by 11 in 20 or that the President would lose Pueblo in 20 when he won it in 16. Defies logic.
The question is, what can we do about it?
Tests are useless. Any software can be programmed to be dependent on a date, like 11/3 behave one way, and any other date earlier or later pass the test with flying colors.
Yes. Our current investigation into Dominion is revealing all sorts of problems. More information will be coming soon.
Any updates?
We’ll be posting a video soon talking about the latest.
heart of vegas free slots [url=https://onlinecasinogameslots21.com/ ]100 most popular free slots [/url] free games for casino slots hollywood quick hit slots free buffalo slots